Category: No category

Salvini wants to introduce the crucifix in schools compulsory, public offices and ports (although I closed)

the – The League plans to make it compulsory display of crucifixes in schools, public offices, university, prisons, consulates, and even in ports, open or closed to migrants that are.
As reported by the Espresso, has already been filed in the parliament the draft special law, signed by the deputy of the Northern League and former PDL Barbara Saltamartini.
The measure provides for a fine of up to one thousand euro for those who break the arrangement, refusing or forgetting to put up the crucifix in a public place.
welcome Discount 25% its RCA, an increasingly agent by your side and the APP to assist closely. Calculate your estimate 2 minutes.
The proposal is awaiting calendarizzata and discussed in the House and Senate, and is entitled: "Provisions relating to the display of the crucifix in schools and public administration offices".
In the report accompanying the presentation of the law, written by Saltamartini, It reads as follows:
"The repeated controversy concerning the presence of the crucifix in classrooms, documented by the press and national media, They have deeply hurt the religious significance not only of the Crucified, but also as' a symbol of civilization and Christian culture, in its historical root, as a universal value, independent of a specific religious denomination ', as already he had authoritatively supported the Council of State, in its Opinion No. 63, espresso in data 27 April 1988?.
"It is apparent unacceptable to the history and tradition of our peoples, if the vaunted secularism of the Republican Constitution was badly interpreted as introducing an obligation Jacobin removal of the Crucifix; it, on the contrary, It remains for thousands of citizens, families and workers the symbol of the history shared by an entire people ".
"Delete the symbols of our identity, undisputed glue of a community, It means a nonsense of the principles that underpin our society. Observe the minority does not mean give up, delegitimize or change the symbols and the values ​​that are part of our history, culture and traditions of our country ".
The League, In short, It seems very determined to bring back an old battle of the center: it would be a standard with a strong symbolic impact, a time to reaffirm, through religion, the need for a breakthrough "identity" of the Italian people.
The message we want to launch Salvini has a lot to do also with the issue of immigration: anyone arriving in Italy, the Interior Minister, must respect cultural traditions, civil and religious of our country.
With this in mind, the crucifix displayed in any public place would therefore represent a "warning" for all.


PakistanIn Pakistan, the persecution of Christians has reached intolerable levels while the government has systematically failed does not protect the rights of minorities, as reported by the associations Minority Rights Group International and Sustainable Development Policy Institute. The report entitled "In Search of Security: the increasing marginalization of the religious communities in Pakistan "highlights some of the most critical aspects of religious persecution in Pakistan: the abuse of the blasphemy law, enslavement of workers belonging to minorities, kidnappings and forced conversions to Islam, the bombings in private institutions and places of worship especially Christians. Discrimination often depends on the laws but is rooted in society and begins at school. Notwithstanding Article 22 of the Constitution of Pakistan states that no one "is forced to receive religious education […] other than their own religion ", Muslim students do not have the opportunity to participate in courses other than those of Islamic studies. When it comes to Islam, then, No error is allowed: emblematic case of a Christian boy who had misspelled a word in a religious poem was expelled from school. The most serious aspect of the school system, but, is the distorted presentation of national history: members of religious minorities are ignored or presented as foreign, emissaries of the Government of India or the West, and not as people who have contributed, like the Muslims, the construction of the motherland Pakistan. So you foment prejudices, extremism and discrimination against minorities. Discrimination are not spared even teachers: a Hindu professor tells it how his colleagues do not let him drink glasses in common. Regarding the work, there is not only the problem of slavery. Minorities are often forced to perform the most menial jobs. Christians who clean the streets for example are treated by people as if they had leprosy. The problem is not simply economic because no Christian could ever open a restaurant in Pakistan because of religious persecution. No Muslim would ever accept to take food from a Christian. On the way Christians can not sell food stalls because Muslims would not let never buy. They can do the cleaning in the house of the Muslims but are underpaid and often are driven based on the false accusation of being thieves. Every Pakistani who belong to a minority experiences on his skin discriminatory acts but these do not cease even when the person is deceased. Often the families of Ahmadis, who believe in a prophet after Muhammad came, can not bury their loved ones in cemeteries common. In one case in October 2013, the corpse of a Hindu was unearthed by a group of Muslims, fomented by the imams of mosques, and taken out of the cemetery because this is only for Muslims. And for Christians is even worse.


coppie gay e adozione“Better two women a violent father”. This, in magazines, The underlying rationale of the judgment of the last 11 January by the Supreme Court on a complex case of foster care. Starring: a child, a father, a mother and her same-sex cohabiting partner. The way the controversy was immediate. A thicket of conflicting opinions that has rekindled the age-old question of adoptions to same-sex couples.
“The judgment – Rose explains Rosnati, Professor of Psychology and the adoption of foster care, member of the University Centre for Studies and Research on the Family (Catholic University of Milan) – confirmed the custody of the child to his mother with whom he lives, regulating the visits of the father, in the past accused of violence against the mother. What emerges is that the court did not consider that the homosexual relationship currently experienced by the mother could be a reason good enough to stop the already established mother-child bond”.
The debate has mis-read this sentence shared a possible opening to the adoption by same-sex couples.
But of this you need to make some clarifications.
“Children who go up for adoption are often in a state of neglect, marked by neglect, years spent in school and often have suffered ill-treatment and abuse. The family, and, primarily, the couple who welcomes them, has the task of promoting, as far as possible, recovery from these adverse experiences. Not an easy task – says the psychologist -. Growing up being able to enjoy the presence of a father and a mother allows the child to know what it means to live and be a man and woman, from what, time in order to delineate a strong masculine or feminine identity. Not only, small at the same time be able to experience the relationship between a man and a woman, able to accept and appreciate the difference of the: here is the foundation of human generation. Two parents of the same sex, by definition, can not provide the child with this basic experience, and then he will be burdened with an additional mental task. Towards adopted children then, the company has a duty to provide them with optimum growing conditions, and certainly not to expose them to additional risk factors”.
You need to remember, also, that the number of pairs available for adoption is far greater than the number of children who may be adopted (both in Italy and abroad): “Più precisely – continues Dr. Rosnati – in 2011 there have been 8.895 applications for national adoption and 4.948 for international adoption: in the same year 909 children were placed in adoption and national 4022 in international adoption. The court thus has the responsibility to select, tant tra le, the couple most likely to accept and to ensure an environment in which the child can recover a dramatic past”.
However, some experts of national reputation, relying on the results of several studies on the topic, argue that living with two parents of the same sex would pose no problem to the development of children: “The research on this topic – adds the expert – offer conflicting results and pose more questions than certainties. How do you know any good researcher, it is difficult to generalize the results from studies that are based on samples meager, conducted on subjects that are often found in a non-random (for example, by activist groups). Also, Another is to note that children who grow up in families omogenitoriali found to be satisfied with their family (In fact, children are very desired and upon which much has been invested), no special problems in the early years and have a successful school, Another is to say that in the long run they will achieve an adequate development from every point of view, also with regard to identity matures”. In other words, how they will be when they grow up?
“There is help in a recent survey of Regnerus – Rose explains Rosnati -, published in 2012 su Social Science Research, who analyzed a sample of nearly 3.000 young people and adults (19-39 years) grown in different family types: what emerges is that children raised by same-sex couples, in particular by pairs of lesbian mothers, are more likely to experience behavioral problems, to have higher levels of depression and greater affective instability, as well as a greater propensity towards homosexual relations, the, even a real rejection of any emotional relationship”. To this we must then add the question of secrecy about the origins, or the identity of the donor and / or the mother who held the baby for 9 months, for money, often by leveraging a situation of extreme poverty (and what happens to them?). Perhaps this is a choice of civilization? This secret is an additional risk factor, because we know the devastating effect that the secrets have. Perhaps we could learn something just from what has happened in the past in the field of adoptions: what consequences they had to pay a lot of guys who have come to discover, maybe accidentally, who were adopted and which reacted with running away from home, suicidi e quant’altro. How then do these couples to see only their right to have a child and not to tremble – and all of us with their – before the great responsibility that involves growing the generations of tomorrow”?


nosigliaTurin 30 March 2013 – ”The Shroud is a message of great hope: in front of a world that spreads messages appealing, but avoidance and disengagement, the Shroud recalls instead the size of a love that gives, which is offered in sacrifice really”. He said the archbishop of Turin, Monsignor Cesare Nosiglia, in an interview with Vatican Radio, at the Exposition of the Shroud extraordinary broadcast around the world this afternoon. The Exhibition, added Nosiglia, ”will last about an hour and a half, and will’ divided into two parts: the first, lasting approximately one hour, sara’ set to the celebration of the Word of Read more